I was thinking that maybe either: A bank employee from low down in the hierarchy is ensuring his/her job security by putting on a show of AML/KYC compliance, i.e. closing an account that received funds that he/she (the bank employee) doesn't know how to trace. or A higher-ranking bank employee, having identified cryptocurrencies as a threat to the bank's business model (e.g. because they can be transferred electronically from person-to-person without banks being involved), has decided to protect his/her livelihood by actions that deter/impede public use of cryptocurrencies.
I already have a secure wallet so I was wondering what the other possibilities were
Comments
or
A higher-ranking bank employee, having identified cryptocurrencies as a threat to the bank's business model (e.g. because they can be transferred electronically from person-to-person without banks being involved), has decided to protect his/her livelihood by actions that deter/impede public use of cryptocurrencies.
I already have a secure wallet so I was wondering what the other possibilities were