GPU Mining is out, come and let us know of your bench scores!

18911131447

Comments

  • oslakoslak Member Posts: 191
    Ozdigger said:


    win 8 rig

    7970 and R9 280

    50mh easy at 480watt

    with my

    windows server rig with 2 x 970 and 1 x 980
    55mh at 470watt

    all not over clocked, a few more mh left on both, we need the miners tuned better.

    Hi, can you share your setup with you're 7970 and R9 280 . I have the same gpu. I dont want to exceed 500 watts please. ty.
  • happytreefriendshappytreefriends Member Posts: 537 ✭✭✭
    Windows 8.1
    XFX R9-390 (8GB RAM) stock 28MH/s @ 210Watts.

    WASTE of $$$ IMO.
  • Marvell9Marvell9 Member Posts: 593 ✭✭✭

    Windows 8.1
    XFX R9-390 (8GB RAM) stock 28MH/s @ 210Watts.

    WASTE of $$$ IMO.

    how do you figure ? at 280x clocks at only 23 mhs and sells for around 230 is vs $320 for a 390, plus the 390s will hold better resale value with their 8GB ram.



  • Marvell9Marvell9 Member Posts: 593 ✭✭✭
    Frederick said:

    Windows 8.1 PRO/ Gigabyte Radeon R9 390x 8GB
    min / mean / max: 25.6 / 26.2 / 28.0

    Inner mean: 27.2553 MH

    Gigabytes are the worst 390s best 390s seem to be MSI and the Trixx ones which push around 30mh/s for the regular 390s and 32 or so for the x. The X is definatly not worth it for the 390s.
  • taz002devtaz002dev 0x26ff3ed5c5025b5a3c288b9139d0396f9de5891fMember Posts: 47
    edited February 2016
    Win 764bit
    7990 (Malta with HynixAFR memory ) - 1000MHz - GPU & 1500Mhz Memory
    ~ 350W/h undervolted at 1.060V

    Benchmark - looks decent while actual hashing is 15-20% lower
    Any advice?

    Bench:
    Trial 1... 51712511
    Trial 2... 52393870
    Trial 3... 51712511
    Trial 4... 51695285
    Trial 5... 53110147
    min/mean/max: 51695285/52124864/53110147 H/s
    inner mean: 52405509 H/s
    Actual mining constantly switching with and average of 42327838.53 Mh/s :-(
    miner  15:22:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 49248187 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.511 s
    miner  15:22:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  15:22:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 49441697 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  15:22:07|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  15:22:07|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 49344752 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.51 s
    miner  15:22:08|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  15:22:08|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 49441697 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  15:22:09|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  15:22:09|main  Mining on PoWhash #1fd1286d : 49441697 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.509 s
    BTW what is inner mean?
  • LogicaluserLogicaluser Member Posts: 214 ✭✭
    edited February 2016
    taz002dev said:

    Win 764bit
    7990 (Malta with HynixAFR memory ) - 1000MHz - GPU & 1500Mhz Memory
    ~ 350W/h undervolted at 1.060V

    Benchmark - looks decent while actual hashing is 15-20% lower
    Any advice?

    the benchmark by default uses the initial block & DAG size, current DAG is +30% larger and thus lower hashrates across the board.

    Genoil released a new build of ethminer (1.03) that allows specifying block number for benchmarking, can find it in the CUDA thread (I'm using it on AMD just fine)

    I run most of my 7970/280x at 1050/1500, altho I haven't worked with a 7990 so may not be advisable from a heat/power usage stanpoint
  • DPS50DPS50 Member Posts: 79
    taz002dev which pool are you using ?
  • capone1340capone1340 Member Posts: 6
    xfx radeon r9 280x 3bg is good for mining ?
  • dont12dont12 Member Posts: 60
    xox 280X is probably the best card
  • taz002devtaz002dev 0x26ff3ed5c5025b5a3c288b9139d0396f9de5891fMember Posts: 47
    edited February 2016
    DPS50 said:

    taz002dev which pool are you using ?

    Soloming with ethminer 0.9.41. Unless ethminer.exe is mining on a pool?

    The commands issued look like this:
    Benchmark:
    ethminer.exe -G -M --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192 --benchmark-warmup 30

    Actual Mining:
    ethminer.exe -G --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192

    These are the best settings for my card. Otherwise it's a lot worse.
    Thanks
  • dianastadianasta Member Posts: 18
    taz002dev said:

    DPS50 said:

    taz002dev which pool are you using ?

    Soloming with ethminer 0.9.41. Unless ethminer.exe is mining on a pool?

    The commands issued look like this:
    Benchmark:
    ethminer.exe -G -M --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192 --benchmark-warmup 30

    Actual Mining:
    ethminer.exe -G --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192

    These are the best settings for my card. Otherwise it's a lot worse.
    Thanks
    Can you show us the ethminer benchmark results with these settings?
  • taz002devtaz002dev 0x26ff3ed5c5025b5a3c288b9139d0396f9de5891fMember Posts: 47
    edited February 2016
    dianasta said:

    taz002dev said:


    Can you show us the ethminer benchmark results with these settings?

    Redone the tests with no change ... so any advice would help?
    Real mining 15-20% down compared to test. really annoying knowing this is one of the best GPUs you can actually mine on.
    ethminer-opencl-0.9.41>ethminer.exe -G -M --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192 --benchmark-warmup 30
    Found suitable OpenCL device [Tahiti] with 3221225472 bytes of GPU memory
    Benchmarking on platform: GPU
    ...
    Trial 1... 53110147
    Trial 2... 51678071
    Trial 3... 52376423
    Trial 4... 51678071
    Trial 5... 51695285
    min/mean/max: 51678071/52107599/53110147 H/s
    inner mean: 52393951 H/s
    Phoning home to find world ranking...
    
    And real mining example averaging those fluctuations is around 42.5Mh/s :-(
    ethminer-opencl-0.9.41>ethminer.exe -G  --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192
    miner  16:26:53|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  16:26:54|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 49539023 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.508 s
    miner  16:26:54|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  16:26:55|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 49344752 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.51 s
    miner  16:26:55|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 41201414 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.509 s
    miner  16:26:56|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 49833314 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.505 s
    miner  16:26:56|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 41610158 H/s = 20971520 hashes / 0.504 s
    miner  16:26:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #2b1f25ba : 49833314 H/s = 25165824 hashes / 0.505 s
    
  • happytreefriendshappytreefriends Member Posts: 537 ✭✭✭
    taz002dev said:

    DPS50 said:

    taz002dev which pool are you using ?

    Soloming with ethminer 0.9.41. Unless ethminer.exe is mining on a pool?

    Actual Mining:
    ethminer.exe -G --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 8192

    These are the best settings for my card. Otherwise it's a lot worse.
    Thanks
    Just for S&G I tried those settings on one of my rigs (3x R7-370's+1 R9-290).
    I got 3% increase in hash rate just from that. Averaging 80MH for the rig now @ 730 watts GPU only use. (PC is a 6core AMD FX using 130watts)

    Is there a way to check for error or reject rates like on other miners?
  • ImAMiner?ImAMiner? Member Posts: 208 ✭✭
    @taz002dev It looks like you didn't specify the block at which the DAG should be created

    https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/17961/#Comment_17961
  • taz002devtaz002dev 0x26ff3ed5c5025b5a3c288b9139d0396f9de5891fMember Posts: 47
    edited February 2016
    ImAMiner? said:

    @taz002dev It looks like you didn't specify the block at which the DAG should be created

    https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/17961/#Comment_17961

    Hi. Thanks for tip. Is it that the initial benchmark is skewed because the block size is bigger now?
    It looks like 3GB cards get a major hit in the arm

    Genoil's latest win 64 I realease produced these results:
    ethminer.exe -G -M 992283 --benchmark-warmup 30
    Trial 1... 44709436
    Trial 2... 45043724
    Trial 3... 44694548
    Trial 4... 44724334
    Trial 5... 44724334
    min/mean/max: 44694548/44779275/45043724 H/s
    inner mean: 44825831 H/s
    
    @happytreefriends -glad it improved your hashrate and you should see over long term if it actually did.
    What to note is this: my settings are particular to my card and it is a computed thing not random numbers made up.
    You should look for stilt posts on litecoin forums so you can understand how is that computed. It's not easy but as you can see it makes a difference. Sometimes a huge one if you understand what are the particularities of your cards.
    Post edited by taz002dev on
  • ImAMiner?ImAMiner? Member Posts: 208 ✭✭
    @taz002dev yeah you got it, the initial dag is much smaller than what it is now.

    are you running stilt's bios on your cards? I still have it on most of mine although I use the regular bios because it's a p.i.t.a. to keep them stable.
  • jstefanopjstefanop Member Posts: 43
    What kind of power are your 280x's pulling? Ive got mine to around 100 watts @ 22MH/s
  • keskerdarkkeskerdark Member Posts: 3
    edited February 2016
    Real mining speed at PoWhash:
    radeon r9 380 2 gb : 22 Mh/s ( 200W )
    radeon r9 390 8 gb : 31,5 Mh/s ( 330W )
  • zonozono Member Posts: 158 ✭✭
    jstefanop said:

    What kind of power are your 280x's pulling? Ive got mine to around 100 watts @ 22MH/s

    No way you pull just 100w
  • jstefanopjstefanop Member Posts: 43
    Its under clocked and under voltage
  • happytreefriendshappytreefriends Member Posts: 537 ✭✭✭
    No way an underclocked and undervolted 280x is pulling 22MH.. at 100watts
  • tolazytolazy Member Posts: 6
    R9 390X Nitro med 8GB GDDR5-minne

    Warming up...
    Trial 1... 27787264
    Trial 2... 27612501
    Trial 3... 27699882
    Trial 4... 27612501
    Trial 5... 27699882
    min/mean/max: 27612501/27682406/27787264 H/s
    inner mean: 18495715 H/s
    Phoning home to find world ranking...

    pool resault: 27.69MHs
  • taz002devtaz002dev 0x26ff3ed5c5025b5a3c288b9139d0396f9de5891fMember Posts: 47
    edited February 2016
    ImAMiner? said:

    @taz002dev yeah you got it, the initial dag is much smaller than what it is now.

    are you running stilt's bios on your cards? I still have it on most of mine although I use the regular bios because it's a p.i.t.a. to keep them stable.

    What cards do you have , what mem, what hashes?
    Still thinking that my 7990 is [email protected] 42-44Mh/s.
    Mine has stock ROM . For this specific core and memory (Malta with Hynix AFR) Stilt has not released a bios because they are stock optimized with no to minor gains in optimizing further. Anyway I've tried flashing some others but like you said PITA :-) for stability reasons.
    For this one just undervolted @1055V and what you see above is what I am getting.
    I think it's puling 350w or so but will know soon once I built a decent platform because now it's just sitting in my desktop.

    I have some 290s and I hope will get some decent bioses for those when I've got the time, stilt ones or whatever I can find to keep them stable, realatively low temps and TDP
  • adasebadaseb Member Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭
    I undervolted a Sapphire R9 280X and it hashes at 22Mh/s and uses 160Watts, probably could go a little lower.
  • zonozono Member Posts: 158 ✭✭
    adaseb said:

    I undervolted a Sapphire R9 280X and it hashes at 22Mh/s and uses 160Watts, probably could go a little lower.

    Can you pls specify how exactly did you do that?
  • restlessrestless Member Posts: 80
    edited February 2016
    A friend of mine tried today to mine with 7850 2gb ram
    But ethminer keeps telling him that no device with sufficient memory is available :open_mouth:
    Any idea what to check?!
    Tried with latest WHQL drivers

    just found:
    https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3jux65/no_gpu_device_with_sufficient_memory_was_found/
  • adasebadaseb Member Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭
    Change VDDC to 1.020 Volts and 970/1450 clock speeds.

    Measured with a seperate PSU both 2 PCIe connectors with the Powered Riser +12V molex and it only used like 160Watts, in reality probably like 140-150Watts not counting PSU efficency.

    Hashes at 22Mh.s
  • oslakoslak Member Posts: 191
    I can't seem to pass 22MH/s on my R9280x toxic win7 4gb ram. Others are reporting 25Mh a sec. that's almost 12 dollars a month difference. Also what voltage is the optimal for this card? This thing is power hungry.
  • LeonidShamisLeonidShamis Member Posts: 1
    Windows / Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) / NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M [ASUS] / 0.9.41
    min/mean/max: 1.22/1.31/1.39 MH/s
    inner mean: 0.9 MH/s

    Too slow :(

    ASUS N53SM Laptop, Intel Core i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz, Quad Core, RAM 4x4GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz
  • zonozono Member Posts: 158 ✭✭
    Is it possible to mine with just 2GB of system RAM?
Sign In or Register to comment.