Ethereum Community Forum
Home› Mining
Vega Finally Unleashed! Fine-tuned performance and power consumption in a single chassis.

CUDA miner

1…6364666869

Comments

  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    try this one and tell me if this works for you if it does then its something i cant think of atm

    ethminer -U -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -O 0x9493bc52d3c4ae6c1aee6204cf1793beb07fdd23.stratum --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106 ✭
    fidasx said:

    Amph said:

    fidasx said:

    Amph said:

    i tried +1000mem and there were artifact, i dunno how you can reach +1600 it's insane

    gpu model?
    g1 gaming
    hmm what tool you using to OC?
    msi afternurner
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Mo35Mo35 Member Posts: 43 ✭
    we need Genoil , is he back from vacation :) ? looking forward to gddr5x optimizations , now that wddm2.1 solved previous issues
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    Amph said:

    fidasx said:

    Amph said:

    fidasx said:

    Amph said:

    i tried +1000mem and there were artifact, i dunno how you can reach +1600 it's insane

    gpu model?
    g1 gaming
    hmm what tool you using to OC?
    msi afternurner
    try gigabytes tool


    http://download.gigabyte.eu/FileList/Utility/gigabyte_xtreme_setup_v1.06.exe

    got to advanced OC tab and set it to OC mode apply then go to OC tab and set the me 1500 and try

    be sure to check that it doesn't reset OC mode it bugs some times if it does then enabled it again
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • wzrdwzrd Member Posts: 5 ✭
    edited August 2016
    I'm running Win 10 Anniv + 369.09 + (110) 1.1.7 Genoil but am only getting around 20 MH w/ 1080 FE.

    Is my batch file screwed up? 

    setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
    setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
    setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
    setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    ethminer.exe --cuda-devices 0 --opencl-device 0 --farm-recheck 200 -G -S us1.ethermine.org:4444 -FS eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -O 0x.wzrd

     m  14:13:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 26.08MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 26.08MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 20.87MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 26.08MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:57|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 25.95MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:58|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 20.87MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:58|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 26.08MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:58|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 26.08MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:13:58|main  Mining on PoWhash #cde76f1d : 20.76MH/s [A4+0:R0+0:F0]
    Thanks.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    -G is for opencl you can use -U for cuda
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • wzrdwzrd Member Posts: 5 ✭
    So I've tried both -G and -U.. seems -U is giving me lower rates. 

      m  14:17:04|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
    CUDA#0: 96%
      m  14:17:04|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 10.43MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    wzrd said:

    So I've tried both -G and -U.. seems -U is giving me lower rates.


      m  14:17:04|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 0.00MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
    CUDA#0: 96%
      m  14:17:04|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 10.43MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:05|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
      m  14:17:06|main  Mining on PoWhash #75c55624 : 20.87MH/s [A0+0:R0+0:F0]
    try this --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • wzrdwzrd Member Posts: 5 ✭
    =[

    Same thing w/ and w/o those settings. Thanks for trying though, I'm sure I've screwed something up but can't seem to find any search results that are similar to my issue.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    whats your gpu model? and brand
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • wzrdwzrd Member Posts: 5 ✭
    Nvidia 1080 FE, straight from nvidia.com.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    ahhh thats the problem then the memory of 1080 is different form 1070 its GDDR5X its not good for mining ETH cause the miner is not optimized for that memory architecture

    every 1080 is the same

    in comparison to 1070 that mines 25-26 MHS in stock
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • wzrdwzrd Member Posts: 5 ✭
    ah gotcha, ok I never considered the RAM differences between the 1070 and 1080. thanks for the clarification.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    wzrd said:

    ah gotcha, ok I never considered the RAM differences between the 1070 and 1080. thanks for the clarification.

    np it will propably get fixed by Genoil
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • pastepaste Member Posts: 5 ✭
    thanks for this thread
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • MadpacketMadpacket Member Posts: 25 ✭
    So any 1060 results yet?
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    Madpacket said:

    So any 1060 results yet?

    18-20 MHS
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • chrizzochrizzo GermanyMember Posts: 131 ✭✭
    for mining is better a R480 then a 1060 (same price). But 1070 are very good. with oc you get nice rates on a 1070!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • scryptrscryptr Member Posts: 20 ✭
    edited August 2016
    1060 vs 960--

    If a 1060 is mining at 18-20 MH/s, it is outperforming a 960 mining at 10MH/s by nearly 100%. A 1060 should use less energy for the task.

    I could conceivably expand my 5 card 960 rig into a 6 card 1060 rig, and more than double the hash rate (52MH/s to more than 100MH/s) with the same power supply. --scryptr
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    scryptr said:

    1060 vs 960--

    If a 1060 is mining at 18-20 MH/s, it is outperforming a 960 mining at 10MH/s by nearly 100%. A 1060 should use less energy for the task.

    I could conceivably expand my 5 card 960 rig into a 6 card 1060 rig, and more than double the hash rate (52MH/s to more than 100MH/s) with the same power supply. --scryptr

    sounds like a clear strategy
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • neokensouneokensou Member Posts: 21 ✭
    Hi everyone,

    I have a 1070 and W7. I tried to understand what i have to do to mine without problems with this videocard.

    ¿Need to change drivers? ¿Install WDDM 2.1? I don't find it. ¿Do i have to change drivers or something?

    Sorry but I'm really lost with last comments of people saying it's working.

    Thanks in advance.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • grimlergrimler Member Posts: 12 ✭
    @fidasx

    why are you guys talking about +1600 mem settings when NOBODY can know your starting point ...

    as in +1600 to WHAT value ...

    your card could be in p2 state or ANY other state and that is why you can set +1600 mem to begin with, BECAUSE you add that value to a lower setting ...

    BESIDES ALL THAT just state your TOTAL memory clock ... there is no need to to tell anybody what you add ...

    I'm sorry to sound a little bit harsh, take it with a grain of salt but it's mind boggling seeing you guys talking of a value you add to something yet not stating to what value you add that ... :D:D:D

    So if you guys want to help anyone please state simply your total amount.
    eg. 9000 MHz memory clock

    (the same is true for core clocks ... simply state your endresult)
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    grimler said:

    @fidasx

    why are you guys talking about +1600 mem settings when NOBODY can know your starting point ...

    as in +1600 to WHAT value ...

    your card could be in p2 state or ANY other state and that is why you can set +1600 mem to begin with, BECAUSE you add that value to a lower setting ...

    BESIDES ALL THAT just state your TOTAL memory clock ... there is no need to to tell anybody what you add ...

    I'm sorry to sound a little bit harsh, take it with a grain of salt but it's mind boggling seeing you guys talking of a value you add to something yet not stating to what value you add that ... :D:D:D

    So if you guys want to help anyone please state simply your total amount.
    eg. 9000 MHz memory clock

    (the same is true for core clocks ... simply state your endresult)

    i think i said i went as far as +1600 ofcourse yes its 9600 hz did you fry your GPU and came here to revenge me?

    not my problem if you cant understand exactly what i said anyways later....
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • retherrether Member Posts: 258 ✭✭
    When mining on the 10xx series of cards are your computers still useless in Windows? For example, I can still browse the web, watch a video, or most minor things on my AMD rig (if I wanted to) but on my desktop system with an nvidia card it's basically stuttering and useless while mining. Do the 10xx cards work the same way?
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    i can do most of the things fine on my PC it also depends of your cpu ram etc... one of the good things about the update 1607 is that windows WDDM 2.1 accelerates the user interface even if your PC resources are almost 100% for example mining

    i can watch a movie fine or even play a game ofc the Hashrate will go down
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • retherrether Member Posts: 258 ✭✭
    fidasx said:

    i can do most of the things fine on my PC it also depends of your cpu ram etc... one of the good things about the update 1607 is that windows WDDM 2.1 accelerates the user interface even if your PC resources are almost 100% for example mining

    i can watch a movie fine or even play a game ofc the Hashrate will go down

    that's interesting. It's my desktop PC I use for daily work but I let it mine overnight when I'm not using it. It's got 16GB of ram and a new CPU so that's not an issue...just seems to be a problem with the older NV cards.

    Unfortunately, I can only get a decent hashrate using CUDA 6.5 and the older drivers on my GTX 960.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • fidasxfidasx GreeceMember Posts: 26 ✭
    rether said:

    fidasx said:

    i can do most of the things fine on my PC it also depends of your cpu ram etc... one of the good things about the update 1607 is that windows WDDM 2.1 accelerates the user interface even if your PC resources are almost 100% for example mining

    i can watch a movie fine or even play a game ofc the Hashrate will go down

    that's interesting. It's my desktop PC I use for daily work but I let it mine overnight when I'm not using it. It's got 16GB of ram and a new CPU so that's not an issue...just seems to be a problem with the older NV cards.

    Unfortunately, I can only get a decent hashrate using CUDA 6.5 and the older drivers on my GTX 960.
    yea few people reporting problems with maxwell series i have tested only with pascal sry bro
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • scryptrscryptr Member Posts: 20 ✭
    edited August 2016
    neokensou said:

    Hi everyone,

    I have a 1070 and W7. I tried to understand what i have to do to mine without problems with this videocard.

    ¿Need to change drivers? ¿Install WDDM 2.1? I don't find it. ¿Do i have to change drivers or something?

    Sorry but I'm really lost with last comments of people saying it's working.

    Thanks in advance.

    IF YOU ARE ON WIN 7 STAY THERE--

    Update your drivers to the latest version at nVidia and you should be OK. Win 10 people are having problems, and until the drivers for Win 10 get completely fixed, stay on Win 7. --scryptr
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • retherrether Member Posts: 258 ✭✭
    Does anyone have a confirmed hashrate for the GTX 1060s? I've seen people say what they should do but no one mentions actually having one.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • kpskps Member Posts: 23 ✭
    As of now i have no problems mining with GTX 1080 on Windows 10 with anniversary update and 369.09 driver, hope they don't break something with next driver update as i use it as my daily driver.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Sign In or Register to comment.