CUDA miner

1575860626369

Comments

  • ma68546ma68546 Member Posts: 9
    edited June 2016
    [EDIT]Driver Update Solved Issue[/EDIT]
    the new miner does not work on 2GB cards :(
    (testet with GTX 960 2GB and some AMD R7 2GB)
    It gets some opencl error..
    Can this be fixed?


    Post edited by ma68546 on
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    is the fix for the issue winth the slow hasrate on windows and pascal, out yet?
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    ma68546 said:

    the new miner does not work on 2GB cards :(
    (testet with GTX 960 2GB and some AMD R7 2GB)
    It gets some opencl error..
    Can this be fixed?

    With a 1.5GB DAG you would think it would still be possible on a 2GB card. What does the GTX960 say when you replace the -G with -U? Perhaps CUDA gives a more specific error message.

    Whjat is the output of ethminer.exe -G --list-devices for both types of cards?
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    Amph said:

    is the fix for the issue winth the slow hasrate on windows and pascal, out yet?

    I'm not sure. I know from somebody who's a little bit closer to the source that he has a full speed 1070 ethminer on Windows. Possibly already released on Windows Insider.

    I don't have Pascal yet, hard to get AIC models here, let alone at reasonable prices.
  • ma68546ma68546 Member Posts: 9
    @Genoil thanks for the hint! It works now.
    For mining we use the 347.52 Driver that gives around three times more hashrate than the newest nvidia drivers.
    (20 mh/s for 980GTX instead of like 7 )
    so it was a driver problem. Updating to 368.39 fixed it.

    anyway great work the new version is very nice!
  • Mo35Mo35 Member Posts: 43
    ma68546 said:

    @Genoil thanks for the hint! It works now.
    For mining we use the 347.52 Driver that gives around three times more hashrate than the newest nvidia drivers.
    (20 mh/s for 980GTX instead of like 7 )
    so it was a driver problem. Updating to 368.39 fixed it.

    anyway great work the new version is very nice!

    Latest driver fixes mining for 9XX cards on which OS ? or its still win7 and linux ?
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    Mo35 said:

    ma68546 said:

    @Genoil thanks for the hint! It works now.
    For mining we use the 347.52 Driver that gives around three times more hashrate than the newest nvidia drivers.
    (20 mh/s for 980GTX instead of like 7 )
    so it was a driver problem. Updating to 368.39 fixed it.

    anyway great work the new version is very nice!

    Latest driver fixes mining for 9XX cards on which OS ? or its still win7 and linux ?
    Afaik still 7/8/Linux. Just sold my 970 because of that. Well and because I want a 10x0. After all I need to keep my promise of using the donations to purchase Pascal ;)
  • SmokyishSmokyish Member Posts: 203 ✭✭
    Genoil said:



    As I told you earlier, I'm not really sure where I should put my efforts next. Perhaps the community can help me decide:

    1. plough on with the fork, adding features like dual mining (waving at bensam1231) and making it more stable
    2. work with the Foundation to upstream my changes into the offcial ethminer
    3. drop AMD/OpenCL support (Claymore and Wolf0 seem to have cornered that market) and move the CUDA miner into ccminer (waving at tpruvot, sp_, djm34), with the ultimate goal of making a generic dual miner (combine any algo)

    Forgot to post this earlier, but i would also vote for option #1 or a 1 and 3 mix :smiley:
    This would be a great benefit for Nvidia users, dual mining would be an attractive feature and as you said, AMD is pretty well covered already, but yours is the only option for CUDA users.
    Not to take anything away from you, you've done an amazing job and i just hope you keep up your great work and push to evolve your miner for the benefit of the community :)
  • net_pt77net_pt77 Member Posts: 2
    Hello Genoil & fellow miners.

    I'm having an hard time setting up my strix 750ti 4GB to achieve decent rates on linux (don't mention windows 8.1).

    So far the best I'd get its 3.3MHs average with 4.4 MHs spikes, it seems some people get ~9MHs real average with this card on ubuntu 14.04 so can someone with the same card and decent performance point me towards the best setup? (drivers/cuda/miner versions used please).

    openCL with etherminer and qtminer give me close results to CUDA.

    To had insult to injury I get ~1.6MHs with a modest gtx 630 2GB just with the 331 nvidia drivers installed... I cant accept that a much powerfull card (~x9) its just twice as fast! I must be screwing something up somewhere :smiley:

    Also if anyone has tried CUDA mining on 14.04 SERVER let me know :wink:

    Thanks in advance for all the help and Genoil for the effort in CUDA mining.


  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @net_pt77 sorry this is all you will get from gtx750. its hashrate is affected by growing DAG size. (1.5GB currently). The 9Mh numbers you read are measured against the 0-dag (1GB)
  • Mo35Mo35 Member Posts: 43
    need suggestions , lately my gtx box win10 , 347.52 with 2x950 and 1x970 started to behave , miner crashing , tried 1.1.7 , 1.1.3 , 1.0.8 , nothing changed OS or HW wise. no OC , stock clocks , temp wise all is ok
    any ideas ?
  • net_pt77net_pt77 Member Posts: 2
    Genoil said:

    @net_pt77 sorry this is all you will get from gtx750. its hashrate is affected by growing DAG size. (1.5GB currently). The 9Mh numbers you read are measured against the 0-dag (1GB)

    So the 4GB on the card can't cope with a 1.5GB DAG? That's disappointing :(

    Well I will just use that card for folding then, its does a good job at it with lower power comsumption.

    Thanks for the help, keep it up the good work!
  • dreambottledreambottle Member Posts: 7
    Hi. I haven't updated for a while and just switched to the 110 branch. My first observation is that all DAG options disappeared (-E, -R), and I don't see the files in the standard ~/.ethash location. It seems that the miner now generates the DAG in memory.

    My question is does it still pre-generate the next-generation DAG? If not, does it effect mining efficiency on generation change?
    Thanks!
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @dreambottle yes you loose about half a minute on DAG change. The current DAG gen can be optimized a bit more, so it will be less :)
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    getting this error with a 1070

    Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1)
    Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.

    -U -S coinotron
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @Amph executable doesn't support Compute 6.1. Try one of my more recent 1.1 builds
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    that was with 1.1.7, should be the last one right?
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    I ran my 1.1.7 builds fine on 1080+win10 (not my system). Did you build from source?

    I'm having a short CUDA break. Sold my 970 to exchange for 1070 but I might wait for 1060 and buy a RX470 on the side. I don't need all that power, i just need the architecture.
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    it's not mine the result, it's just from another guy, i'm posting what he get since he don't have time to follow, i think he simply downloaded the raw file
  • MoarHashMoarHash Member Posts: 13
    I've got some 1070's coming in on Wednesday. Are they up and running well with Windows 10 as of now or is Linux my only option so far?
  • JPSJPS Member Posts: 63
    edited July 2016
    Where are the ready-to-run binaries of the latest version? I only see 1.0.8 and I have 2x 1080 and 1x 1070 in my hands that I want to play with o:)
    I'm running the insider preview so I wanna see what it does.

    EDIT: Found... @Genoil Please update the 1st post on bitcointalk to reflect the correct location :/
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    edited July 2016
    Post edited by Amph on
  • JPSJPS Member Posts: 63
    M.U.S.T. P.L.A.Y. G.A.M.E.S. F.I.R.S.T. :p
  • JPSJPS Member Posts: 63
    edited July 2016
    Preliminary findings, using 1.1.7 with 2x 1080:

    - On windows 8.1 I get errors. Something about a timeout after creating DAG, display driver crashes after that. I didn't feel like looking for a solution, since it will be 10 or burst (well... or linux :# )
    - On the current windows 10, I get the expected 8 Mh/s. However, it doesn't matter if I use 1 or 2 cards, it will remain 8 Mh/s. Also, I still need to use --cuda-devices 0 1 to make the miner see both cards.

    I'm waiting for my Insider Preview to clear now, and will see what that does.

    EDIT: Insider Preview gives the same result: 8Mh/s

    Next stop: Linux I guess...
    Post edited by JPS on
  • Bensam123Bensam123 Member Posts: 62
    Amph said:

    getting this error with a 1070

    Using device: GeForce GTX 1070 (Compute 6.1)
    Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 143 : invalid device symbol.

    -U -S coinotron

    Don't worry... If you wait a month, it'll happen then. Funny, it's already been talked about. XD

    Oh wait, you actually care now that you own a 1070? Awww... And Amph's heart grew ten sizes... because he owns something someone is having a problem with now.

    Cute.


    Everything is still broken with the 1XXX on Windows. Apparently there is some sort of magical driver that will come out this month that'll fix everything or so I've been told.
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    edited July 2016
    actually i don't own it yet, i posted those result for another user, maybe he did something wrong

    the guy vaulter or what is his nick, said that it work already on win 10, you can do 27MH at 105w, you need the insider build, win7 is still broken, we need to wait for genoil to sort it out...
    Post edited by Amph on
  • Bensam123Bensam123 Member Posts: 62
    I reported the same thing over a week ago, to which you replied to it and told me that it would be fixed. Not sure why you're reporting it for your 'friend' again.

    He didn't do anything wrong. It's broken.
  • AmphAmph Member Posts: 106
    edited July 2016
    then i can not explain why it work for genoil and a bunch of other users
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @Amph which build are you using?
  • xtcvapirxtcvapir Member Posts: 4
    I have a 1070 wouldn't mind testing Win10/1070 stuff for you.
Sign In or Register to comment.