Ethereum Community Forum
›
Vega Finally Unleashed! Fine-tuned performance and power consumption in a single chassis.

CUDA miner

1…3334363839…69

Comments

  • xenomorph113xenomorph113 Member Posts: 7 ✭
    edited March 2016
    Sweet said:

    ksukhin said:

    Sweet said:

    Hey guys, just started mining with my GTX 770 but having a hashrate around 2MH/s... Don't know where it comes from. Any help is appreciated!
    Thank you :)

    are you still having an issue?
    Yes, searched old drivers for my graphics card as it seems to be one issue but can't find them.. I really don't know what to do.
    heres a link to the drivers Ive been using

    http://www.geforce.com/drivers/results/83080

    its the 347.88 drivers, should work with windows vista/7/8/8.1/10

    2MH/s seems low for a 770, my 670 gets 8.5Mh/s

    also if you are using windows 10 you probably need to kill auto driver updates as @Marvell9 suggested https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3073930
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • blueboxbluebox Member Posts: 181 ✭✭
    Sweet said:

    ksukhin said:

    Sweet said:

    Hey guys, just started mining with my GTX 770 but having a hashrate around 2MH/s... Don't know where it comes from. Any help is appreciated!
    Thank you :)

    are you still having an issue?
    Yes, searched old drivers for my graphics card as it seems to be one issue but can't find them.. I really don't know what to do.
    If you're on Win 10 and need to replace the microsoft driver (remember to blacklist it so it doesn't get re-installed), here's the 347.88WHQL version you can try:
    http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/83080/en-us
    I understand the 352.xx driver works too, search this forum for info.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dreambottledreambottle Member Posts: 7 ✭
    The miner SEEMS to be working fine at 15 MH at my gtx770, but in reality does not mine any ether! I wasted about a day before I realized this. Any ideas about the reasons of this?

    I also tested it on GTX750Ti. It only works with --cuda-grid-size 4098 --cuda-block-size 64 parameters, otherwise the driver crashes. And gives a hashrate of only 0.2MH, (opencl gives 0.44, which is still pretty low IMO, i'm not sure about the reasons of this)

    I'm using Win7 and Driver v. 353.90
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AntaresAntares Member Posts: 1 ✭
    edited March 2016
    kenshirothefist said:

    @eddy4 thanks for the info on 15.10 ... I decided to stick with 14.04, I prefer not to use too hacky methods ;) (I need stable setups too test various rigs on our NiceHash.com service and NiceHash Miner sw).

    Regarding 24/26 MH/s with a 7950/7970 -> ha, that was a couple of months ago ... now with DAG file increase I get more like 20/22 with a 7950/7970 (both clocked at 1100/1500).

    Anyway, currently NVIDIA GTX 970 is absolute winner in terms of efficiency. Stable 22 MH/s at 1550/3505 and only 175W of power consumption ... a true money (eth) maker ;)

    Hi guys

    Hi @kenshirothefist :)

    Very nice speeds. Would you be so kind to share your bat settings, drivers number and miner (ethminer with/without proxy or in a pool?)

    Thank you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SweetSweet Member Posts: 4 ✭
    Quick update, downloaded old drivers 347.52 I think, still didn't change my hashrate. Quite disappointed as I don't want to downgrade to Windows 7 (I'm on Windows 8.1).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kenshirothefistkenshirothefist Member Posts: 73 ✭
    Antares said:

    kenshirothefist said:


    Anyway, currently NVIDIA GTX 970 is absolute winner in terms of efficiency. Stable 22 MH/s at 1550/3505 and only 175W of power consumption ... a true money (eth) maker ;)

    Hi @kenshirothefist :)

    Very nice speeds. Would you be so kind to share your bat settings, drivers number and miner (ethminer with/without proxy or in a pool?)
    Thank you
    Ubuntu 14.04, latest drivers, 1550/3505 gpu/mem speed, max performance state, mining on NiceHash https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=software#eth via sammy's proxy using NiceHash Miner (https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMiner)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SweetSweet Member Posts: 4 ✭
    xenomorph113 said:

    Sweet said:

    ksukhin said:

    Sweet said:

    Hey guys, just started mining with my GTX 770 but having a hashrate around 2MH/s... Don't know where it comes from. Any help is appreciated!
    Thank you :)

    are you still having an issue?
    Yes, searched old drivers for my graphics card as it seems to be one issue but can't find them.. I really don't know what to do.
    heres a link to the drivers Ive been using

    http://www.geforce.com/drivers/results/83080

    its the 347.88 drivers, should work with windows vista/7/8/8.1/10

    2MH/s seems low for a 770, my 670 gets 8.5Mh/s

    also if you are using windows 10 you probably need to kill auto driver updates as @Marvell9 suggested https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3073930
    Thank you, downloading it atm. Will install it and tell you if it works !
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Marvell9Marvell9 Member Posts: 593 ✭✭✭
    @Sweet the driver updates thing only works for a while , make sure to turn off ALL updates so the machine never reboots , i had an update run after a few days and it uploaded new drivers and screwed up my box
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VolodathVolodath Member Posts: 12 ✭
    I hope this is the right place for this question.

    Currently looking into mining, looks like my GTX 950 should be getting ~9-10MH/s. However when I run the miner with this test
    >ethminer -U -F -G -M

    I get 999472H/s as my inner mean. Am I doing math wrong, or is that .9MH/s, or a tenth of what others are reporting? I'm on W10 with nVidia drivers 361.75.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • xenomorph113xenomorph113 Member Posts: 7 ✭
    edited March 2016
    Volodath said:

    I hope this is the right place for this question.

    Currently looking into mining, looks like my GTX 950 should be getting ~9-10MH/s. However when I run the miner with this test
    >ethminer -U -F -G -M

    I get 999472H/s as my inner mean. Am I doing math wrong, or is that .9MH/s, or a tenth of what others are reporting? I'm on W10 with nVidia drivers 361.75.

    i believe the problem lies with your drivers, 361.75 seems to new to work with a geforce 9xx and windows 10, so far the latest drivers ive been able to mine at any decent speed have been either 347.52 or 347.88, though not "officially" for windows 10 they do indeed work, however you will also need to kill the auto updates on windows

    *Edit* Also i believe that your command line could be causing issues, i would only use either the -U or -G not both, as one is openCL and one is CUDA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @Volodath @xenomorph113 the problem is that 950 is newer than 347 series drivers, so it's unsupported. Look up some pages back some posts by @Mo35 who has managed to get decent speeds on Win10 with a 950 and those drivers.

    Tomorrow I'll join the driver hacking party as I've said goodbye to my Win7/GTX780 and will get a GTX970 on Win8 (too lazy to upgrade to 10)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MemeticParadigmMemeticParadigm Member Posts: 1 ✭
    So, I'm running this on two separate windows machines, both nvidia cards with compute capability 3.0, both pointed at the same Stratum proxy, and the older card is reporting ~5.1MHs while the pool is saying it's got an effective rate of 5.6MHs, meanwhile the newer card's reporting ~11MHs, but the pool is saying it's got an effective rate of only 7.7MHs. The exact numbers fluctuate, but the older/slower card consistently gets an effective rate just a little above its reported rate, while the newer/faster card is consistently showing 25-35% below its reported rate.

    Any idea where I might start looking for the source of the discrepancy?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • blueboxbluebox Member Posts: 181 ✭✭
    @MemeticParadigm I've seen fluctuations of 50% sometimes only running about 42MH/s. All has to do with rate of submits from what I can gather, which goes up and down regularly. Didn't matter which pool I used, either — same thing happens.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    1.0.5 is up.
    - Compute 3.0 works again. 11.9MH/s on a g2.2xlarge AWS instance. So that makes 47.6MH/s for a g2.8xlarge...
    - Refactored OpenCL code. Down from 83 to 78 VGPRs on GCN. 14 to go...

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KoSoVaRKoSoVaR Member Posts: 10 ✭
    edited March 2016
    Anyone have hash rates for a 970 / Titan X?
    Genoil said:

    1.0.5 is up.
    - Compute 3.0 works again. 11.9MH/s on a g2.2xlarge AWS instance. So that makes 47.6MH/s for a g2.8xlarge...
    - Refactored OpenCL code. Down from 83 to 78 VGPRs on GCN. 14 to go...

    Great work @Genoil

    Using grid size 8192, block size 128, not seeing much difference, if at all. Would I want to recreate the DAG? Using the same one that was generated. Power usage below collected using nvidia-smi.

    I'm getting the same hashrate on both 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 with a 970 (18.7MH/s @ 153w) and a Titan X (20.8MH/s @ 185w)

    Do I need to explicitly set Compute 3.0, or is this something different from when I see Using device: GeForce GTX 970 (Compute 5.2) when running ethminer?

    Edit: Duh, build with DCOMPUTE=30 ? Looking at it now...

    Edit 2:

    When I build with cmake -DBUNDLE=cudaminer -DCOMPUTE=30, I'm now getting an error and ethminer quits with, "Cuda error in func 'set_constants' at line 45 : invalid device symbol." However, I'm still seeing Using device: GeForce GTX 970 (Compute 5.2)

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @KoSoVaR don't try compute 3.0 on a 5.2 device. This release is mostly to answer a lot of requests I got from people with older hardware (GTX 6x0, 760, 770) and cloud GPUs (K520).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KoSoVaRKoSoVaR Member Posts: 10 ✭
    edited March 2016
    Genoil said:

    @KoSoVaR don't try compute 3.0 on a 5.2 device. This release is mostly to answer a lot of requests I got from people with older hardware (GTX 6x0, 760, 770) and cloud GPUs (K520).

    Thanks for clarifying @Genoil. Understood. If you want some access to 970 or Titan X, feel free to hit me up. Willing to give you full SSH access to a machine I have with 1 of each.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VolodathVolodath Member Posts: 12 ✭
    @Genoil - will the 0.9.41-genoil-1.0.5 give a benefit to a GTX 950? Also would you recommend using --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --cuda-turbo commands for the same card?

    @Mo35 any tips on installing 347.52 on W10? I run in compatibility mode and get... nothing? It errors out even if I run as admin, but something installed as I get ~4.5MH/s now. Does W10 need the CUDA 6.5 tools?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • XarlithXarlith Member Posts: 3 ✭
    edited March 2016
    Ethminer crashes with AMD and NVIDIA running on the same platform. No issues if one of the GPUs is plugged out.

    Windows 10, ethminer compiled from git, 347.52 and 15.12 drivers.

    Here is my console output:

    NVIDIA (CUDA)
    F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5>ethminer.exe -S us1.ethpool.org:3333 -U -O 2bF5a4A4a0cB48946E957E38B4D4263f7F19828b.GTX970/20 --cuda-grid-size 8192 --cuda-block-size 128 --farm-recheck 200 Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.0.5 ===================================================================== Forked from github.com/ethereum/cpp-ethereum CUDA kernel ported from Tim Hughes' OpenCL kernel With contributions from RoBiK, tpruvot and sp_ Please consider a donation to: ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d Using grid size 8192, block size 128 Found suitable CUDA device [GeForce GTX 970] with 4294967296 bytes of GPU memory i 22:31:47|main Connecting to stratum server us1.ethpool.org:3333 i 22:31:48|<unknown> Connected to stratum server us1.ethpool.org : 3333 i 22:31:48|<unknown> Starting farm miner 22:31:48|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:48|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:48|<unknown> Subscribed to stratum server miner 22:31:48|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:48|<unknown> Authorized worker 2bF5a4A4a0cB48946E957E38B4D4263f7F19828b.GTX970/20 i 22:31:48|<unknown> Received new job #2e45a302f77dbcbba92db0a498d23e58445f6fd45f606161ab8e7cb308918ff4 i 22:31:48|<unknown> Header hash: 0x2e45a302f77dbcbba92db0a498d23e58445f6fd45f606161ab8e7cb308918ff4 i 22:31:48|<unknown> Seed hash: 0x39238891c3ff3084a1264284ac4e2bb99f55430db15300f26f5c55eca8edd3c7 i 22:31:48|<unknown> Share target: 0x0000000112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba i 22:31:48|<unknown> Grabbing DAG for #39238891ÔÇŽ miner 22:31:48|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:49|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:49|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:49|<unknown> Loading full DAG of seedhash: #03b8bc47ÔÇŽ i 22:31:49|cudaminer0 workLoop 0 #00000000ÔÇŽ #39238891ÔÇŽ i 22:31:49|cudaminer0 Initialising miner... miner 22:31:49|main Mining on PoWhash #2e45a302ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.009 s miner 22:31:49|main Mining on PoWhash #2e45a302ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s miner 22:31:49|main Mining on PoWhash #2e45a302ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s miner 22:31:50|main Mining on PoWhash #2e45a302ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s Usi F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5
    AMD
    F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5>ethminer.exe -S us1.ethpool.org:3333 -G -O 2bF5a4A4a0cB48946E957E38B4D4263f7F19828b --opencl-platform 2 --farm-recheck 200 Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.0.5 ===================================================================== Forked from github.com/ethereum/cpp-ethereum CUDA kernel ported from Tim Hughes' OpenCL kernel With contributions from RoBiK, tpruvot and sp_ Please consider a donation to: ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d Found suitable OpenCL device [Tahiti] with 3221225472 bytes of GPU memory i 22:31:13|main Connecting to stratum server us1.ethpool.org:3333 i 22:31:14|<unknown> Connected to stratum server us1.ethpool.org : 3333 i 22:31:14|<unknown> Starting farm miner 22:31:14|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:14|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:14|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:14|<unknown> Subscribed to stratum server miner 22:31:14|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:14|<unknown> Authorized worker 2bF5a4A4a0cB48946E957E38B4D4263f7F19828b miner 22:31:14|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:15|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:15|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:15|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:15|<unknown> Received new job #27750b13f00f230fba20b705bdf90bb964ecf7a0de1c42dc6ea82af77c6d5fd0 i 22:31:15|<unknown> Header hash: 0x27750b13f00f230fba20b705bdf90bb964ecf7a0de1c42dc6ea82af77c6d5fd0 i 22:31:15|<unknown> Seed hash: 0x39238891c3ff3084a1264284ac4e2bb99f55430db15300f26f5c55eca8edd3c7 i 22:31:15|<unknown> Share target: 0x0000000112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba i 22:31:15|<unknown> Grabbing DAG for #39238891ÔÇŽ miner 22:31:15|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:15|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:16|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:16|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:16|<unknown> Loading full DAG of seedhash: #03b8bc47ÔÇŽ i 22:31:16|gpuminer0 workLoop 0 #00000000ÔÇŽ #39238891ÔÇŽ i 22:31:16|gpuminer0 Initialising miner... miner 22:31:16|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.109 s miner 22:31:16|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s miner 22:31:17|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s miner 22:31:17|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s Using platfor F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5
    NVIDIA (OpenCL)
    F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5>ethminer.exe -S us1.ethpool.org:3333 -G -O 2bF5a4A4a0cB48946E957E38B4D4263f7F19828b --opencl-platform 1 --farm-recheck 200 Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.0.5 ===================================================================== Forked from github.com/ethereum/cpp-ethereum CUDA kernel ported from Tim Hughes' OpenCL kernel With contributions from RoBiK, tpruvot and sp_ Please consider a donation to: ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d Found suitable OpenCL device [GeForce GTX 970] with 4294967296 bytes of GPU memory i 22:31:05|main Connecting to stratum server us1.ethpool.org:3333 i 22:31:06|<unknown> Connected to stratum server us1.ethpool.org : 3333 i 22:31:06|<unknown> Starting farm miner 22:31:06|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:06|<unknown> Subscribed to stratum server miner 22:31:06|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:06|<unknown> Authorized worker 2bF5a4A4a0cB48946E957E38B4D4263f7F19828b i 22:31:06|<unknown> Received new job #27750b13f00f230fba20b705bdf90bb964ecf7a0de1c42dc6ea82af77c6d5fd0 i 22:31:06|<unknown> Header hash: 0x27750b13f00f230fba20b705bdf90bb964ecf7a0de1c42dc6ea82af77c6d5fd0 i 22:31:06|<unknown> Seed hash: 0x39238891c3ff3084a1264284ac4e2bb99f55430db15300f26f5c55eca8edd3c7 i 22:31:06|<unknown> Share target: 0x0000000112e0be826d694b2e62d01511f12a6061fbaec8bc02357593e70e52ba i 22:31:06|<unknown> Grabbing DAG for #39238891ÔÇŽ miner 22:31:06|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:06|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:06|main Waiting for work package... miner 22:31:07|main Waiting for work package... i 22:31:07|<unknown> Loading full DAG of seedhash: #03b8bc47ÔÇŽ i 22:31:07|gpuminer0 workLoop 0 #00000000ÔÇŽ #39238891ÔÇŽ i 22:31:07|gpuminer0 Initialising miner... miner 22:31:07|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.14 s miner 22:31:07|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s miner 22:31:07|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s miner 22:31:07|main Mining on PoWhash #27750b13ÔÇŽ : 0 H/s = 0 hashes / 0.203 s Using platfor F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5
    Device list (empty?)
    F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5>ethminer.exe --device-list Genoil's ethminer 0.9.41-genoil-1.0.5 ===================================================================== Forked from github.com/ethereum/cpp-ethereum CUDA kernel ported from Tim Hughes' OpenCL kernel With contributions from RoBiK, tpruvot and sp_ Please consider a donation to: ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d Invalid argument: --device-list F:\ethminer-git-1.0.5>


    Any suggestions, solutions?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hozehoze Member Posts: 27 ✭
    xenomorph113 said:

    Volodath said:

    I hope this is the right place for this question.

    Currently looking into mining, looks like my GTX 950 should be getting ~9-10MH/s. However when I run the miner with this test
    >ethminer -U -F -G -M

    I get 999472H/s as my inner mean. Am I doing math wrong, or is that .9MH/s, or a tenth of what others are reporting? I'm on W10 with nVidia drivers 361.75.

    i believe the problem lies with your drivers, 361.75 seems to new to work with a geforce 9xx and windows 10, so far the latest drivers ive been able to mine at any decent speed have been either 347.52 or 347.88, though not "officially" for windows 10 they do indeed work, however you will also need to kill the auto updates on windows

    *Edit* Also i believe that your command line could be causing issues, i would only use either the -U or -G not both, as one is openCL and one is CUDA
    Any help for using 347.52 driver in win 10 64bit for gtx 950 ??
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @Xarlith I'm going to look into that soon as I've got a brand new 970 waiting to be plugged in alongside the 7950. This will also allow me to experience the win 8/10 driver downgrade.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hozehoze Member Posts: 27 ✭


    This is the best I can get :( Gtx 950 Win 10 64bit 361.75 drivers
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sikuntsikunt Member Posts: 13 ✭


    Trying out my laptop gpu but i get this error, Any help would be appreciated
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bensam123Bensam123 Member Posts: 62 ✭
    Genoil said:

    1.0.5 is up.
    - Compute 3.0 works again. 11.9MH/s on a g2.2xlarge AWS instance. So that makes 47.6MH/s for a g2.8xlarge...
    - Refactored OpenCL code. Down from 83 to 78 VGPRs on GCN. 14 to go...

    Does it delete old dag files after generating new ones?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BiteTheCoinBiteTheCoin Member Posts: 6 ✭
    Genoil said:

    @KoSoVaR don't try compute 3.0 on a 5.2 device. This release is mostly to answer a lot of requests I got from people with older hardware (GTX 6x0, 760, 770) and cloud GPUs (K520).

    On Ubuntu for OpenCL, what cmake and compiling instructions should be used now?

    I'm getting:

    miner 16:37:09|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #51848f83⦠: 9039448 H/s = 1835008 hashes / 0.203 s
    miner 16:37:10|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #51848f83⦠: 10381940 H/s = 2097152 hashes / 0.202 s
    miner 16:37:10|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #51848f83⦠: 9084198 H/s = 1835008 hashes / 0.202 s
    miner 16:37:10|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #51848f83⦠: 9084198 H/s = 1835008 hashes / 0.202 s
    miner 16:37:10|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #51848f83⦠: 10330798 H/s = 2097152 hashes / 0.203 s
    miner 16:37:10|ethminer Mining on PoWhash #51848f83⦠: 9039448 H/s = 1835008 hashes / 0.203 s

    Dwarf reports 9.03 Sent MH, but Calc is 12MH, so not sure which one is "correct".
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • kenshirothefistkenshirothefist Member Posts: 73 ✭
    @Genoil do you still have these two on yours to-do list? ;)

    https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/19295/#Comment_19295

    https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/21097/#Comment_21097

    Thanks!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dreambottledreambottle Member Posts: 7 ✭
    Just want to say thanks for the 1.0.5 release. Now it works perfectly on an OC'ed GTX770, resulting in impressive (for NVIDIA) 18 Mhash/s, compared to 12 I had on openCL!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    edited March 2016
    @dreambottle that's great to hear! 18MH/s for a 770 is indeed pretty impressive.

    I tried to install a new 970 alongside the 7950 today (well, actually moved the 7950 up one slot) but that wasn't a success. The 7950 already hung up my system after a few seconds of eth hashing when I didn't even have the nvidia drivers installed. So I guess I'll have to build a separate test system for that. I couldn't stand the noise that thing made anyway.

    Very happy with the 970 and also very happy not have installed Win10 yet. With the new 364.51 drivers it simply hashes away at about 19MH/s. No TLB trashing for me :). Or can someone with Win10 confirm they have finally solved the issue?

    RE: boring features. i hear you guys...hope to find some time coming week.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • heandog69heandog69 Member Posts: 283 ✭✭
    interesting read it appears windows 10 is my problem im trying to hash on a nividia gtx960m and its so slow working but slow, tried rolling back drivers etc nothing at all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bensam123Bensam123 Member Posts: 62 ✭
    Genoil said:


    RE: boring features. i hear you guys...hope to find some time coming week.

    I already donated to you bro. This should be something easy to implement. Please do it for everyone that has shitty small SSDs.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.