Ethereum Community Forum
Home› Mining
Vega Finally Unleashed! Fine-tuned performance and power consumption in a single chassis.

GPU Mining is out, come and let us know of your bench scores!

1…78101213…47

Comments

  • cosmossurfercosmossurfer EarthMember Posts: 3 ✭
    Trial 1... [OPENCL]:[OPENCL]:Using platform: Using platform: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
    AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
    [OPENCL]:Using device: Hawaii(OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1800.11))
    [OPENCL]:Using device: Hawaii(OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1800.11))
    [OPENCL]:Printing program log
    [OPENCL]:
    [OPENCL]:Creating one big buffer for the DAG
    [OPENCL]:Loading single big chunk kernels
    [OPENCL]:Mapping one big chunk.
    0
    Trial 2... [OPENCL]:Printing program log
    [OPENCL]:
    [OPENCL]:Creating one big buffer for the DAG
    [OPENCL]:Loading single big chunk kernels
    [OPENCL]:Mapping one big chunk.
    [OPENCL]:Creating buffer for header.
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 0
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 1
    [OPENCL]:Creating buffer for header.
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 0
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 1
    21321045
    Trial 3... 42991616
    Trial 4... 42729472
    Trial 5... 42467328
    min/mean/max: 0/29901892/42991616 H/s
    inner mean: 35505948 H/s
    Phoning home to find world ranking...
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • CarsonCarson Member Posts: 10 ✭
    Eastwind said:

    When you do the benchmark, the DAG file size could be smaller than the actual mining, so the speed is faster.

    For 7950, 55/3=18.3 MH is reasonable.

    I was thinking to complain about my 7950s doing jumpy 18-22, it seems a reasonable speed.

    update: now it seems stable at 20xxxxxx h/s most of the time.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • sebstarsebstar Member Posts: 6 ✭
    Coinbeast said:

    Windows 7/ AM2+ 8150 / 2x GTX 660

    15MH/S

    *UPDATE*
    18.3 MH/S

    Arch Linux / Intel i5 760 / 16GB RAM / 2x GTX 660
    Running latest git version of webthree ethminer

    --> 16 MH/s <--

    Unfortunately, I also have 2x 100% CPU usage (both in constant TurboMode 3.3GHz)

    @Conibeast, which software are you running to achieve 18.3 MH/s
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • crazyivancrazyivan Member Posts: 23 ✭
    What do you people get for Asus 390x?
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @sebstar I think you should be able to get more out of the 660s using my cudaminer-uint64 branch. I dropped Compute 3.0 support from the (main) cudaminer-frontier branch, but that branch has some nice CPU saving code.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Marvell9Marvell9 Member Posts: 593 ✭✭✭
    Genoil said:

    @sebstar I think you should be able to get more out of the 660s using my cudaminer-uint64 branch. I dropped Compute 3.0 support from the (main) cudaminer-frontier branch, but that branch has some nice CPU saving code.

    I would like to try your custom ethminer build, not sure where to start with it though , do you have updated windows binaries out there ? or do we have to build from githhub which seems to be a pain in Windows.

    Also to use your miner do we need the run that dagapolalpypse thing or just run the miner ? I have the build you posted on the forums on another theread but it requires some Cuda DLLs which i did download but not sure if I am running the miner properly.

    I have a mix of 7950, 280xs and 390s
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • unknown999unknown999 Member Posts: 2 ✭
    so I have higher rates on the benchmark because my DAG file is smaller? I noticed the benchmark DAG is about 1.1 GB while the mining DAG is about 1.3GB.

    Will the DAG file keep growing? If so does that mean our mining speed would decrease as time increase?

    Whats the max size the DAG can grow to?

    Also why does the benchmark in windows shows slower rate? Benchmark in windows shows 58mhash while in ubuntu shows 65mhash on the same cards? 3x 7950s.

    Lastly how can I get my real hash rate from my miner on ubuntu? It does not show the mining speed like it does on windows.

    Thanks.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • oscerooscero Member Posts: 1 ✭
    edited January 2016
    NeilBartlett said:

    Ubuntu 15.04. Core i5. 8GB.
    min/mean/max: 18612224/18926796/19049130 H/s
    inner mean: 12641166 H/s

    Hmm, seems lot's of posts here with 280's that perform much more hashes. Isn't 380 supposed to be rebranded 280's? It should be the same or faster (from OC) than 280's?
    Have you tried it some more?

    [EDIT:] - Nevermind! I realize now that the memory bus width on the 360 is 256bit vs. the 384bit on the 280 - thereby even making 4GB a complete waste on the 380 :-/ [/EDIT]
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    Marvell9 said:

    Genoil said:

    @sebstar I think you should be able to get more out of the 660s using my cudaminer-uint64 branch. I dropped Compute 3.0 support from the (main) cudaminer-frontier branch, but that branch has some nice CPU saving code.

    I would like to try your custom ethminer build, not sure where to start with it though , do you have updated windows binaries out there ? or do we have to build from githhub which seems to be a pain in Windows.

    Also to use your miner do we need the run that dagapolalpypse thing or just run the miner ? I have the build you posted on the forums on another theread but it requires some Cuda DLLs which i did download but not sure if I am running the miner properly.

    I have a mix of 7950, 280xs and 390s
    I have new binaries posted today in the release folder on github. But really there's no point in using it instead of the stock miner if you have AMD, it uses the same kernel in OpenCL mode. Well it does display hashrate in the console, that's something many people want.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Film54Film54 Member Posts: 2 ✭
    Ubuntu / 14.04 / Radeon R9 290x 4GB /
    min / mean / max: 0 / 10.5 / 25.5
    Inner mean: 17.5 MH

    Anyone know why I get 0 for the min? Is this something I can fix?

    This is what prints when I run the bench:

    [OPENCL]:Creating one big buffer for the DAG
    [OPENCL]:Loading single big chunk kernels
    [OPENCL]:Mapping one big chunk.
    Trial 1... 0
    Trial 2... 0
    Trial 3... [OPENCL]:Creating buffer for header.
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 0
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 1
    1660245
    Trial 4... 25427968
    Trial 5... 25515349
    min/mean/max: 0/10520712/25515349 H/s
    inner mean: 17534520 H/s

    Any ideas to what is going wrong with the min? Thanks for the help!

    --Neil

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    @Film54 the benchmark does not wait until your GPU's RAM is completely loaded and its CU's saturated. Try again using --warmup-time 10 or longer.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • marcusmarcus Member Posts: 2 ✭
    Ubuntu / 14.04.2 / Radeon R9 390x 8GB

    min/mean/max: 0/5050641/25253205 H/s
    inner mean: 8417735 H/s
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Film54Film54 Member Posts: 2 ✭
    Genoil said:

    @Film54 the benchmark does not wait until your GPU's RAM is completely loaded and its CU's saturated. Try again using --warmup-time 10 or longer.

    Thanks @Genoil, I'm sure that will solve my issue. I'll give it a try and post bench here later today.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • volosincuvolosincu Member Posts: 1 ✭
    edited January 2016
    ubuntu 14.04 / AMD Radeon R5 M330 - 2GB

    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 0
    [OPENCL]:Creating mining buffer 1
    786432
    Trial 3... 1223338
    Trial 4... 1223338
    Trial 5... 1223338
    min/mean/max: 0/891289/1223338 H/s
    inner mean: 669923 H/s
    Post edited by volosincu on
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • LogicaluserLogicaluser Member Posts: 214 ✭✭
    Genoil said:

    @Film54 the benchmark does not wait until your GPU's RAM is completely loaded and its CU's saturated. Try again using --warmup-time 10 or longer.

    Do you know of a way to get the benchmark to use current or custom DAG sizes instead of the ~1GB test DAG?

    I've been meaning to do some fine tuning again, but the benchmark is no longer indicative of current mining stresses, hashrates seem to be far more tied to memory timings/performance than they were 6 months back.

    Some cards seem to be suffering far more than others, 7950/280x with Elpida memory seem the most impacted thus far
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • GenoilGenoil 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4dMember Posts: 769 ✭✭✭
    edited February 2016
    @Logicaluser yes I know of a way. Sounds like a nice afternoon project.

    http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/17961/#Comment_17961
    Post edited by Genoil on
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • kopamkopam Member Posts: 12 ✭
    Can some one please tell me how to do a benchmark test, THANK YOU!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Dr_VictorDr_Victor Member Posts: 4 ✭
    To do benchmark test run: ethminer -C -F http://eth-mine.suprnova.cc:3000/User_Name.worker/50 -M
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Dr_VictorDr_Victor Member Posts: 4 ✭
    Please, recommend me the version of AMD driver for GPU mining. With 14.9 I have 138M, but with 15.12 only 100M. Does anybody know which is the best?
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • EastwindEastwind Member Posts: 107 ✭
    15.7 is fine.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • LogicaluserLogicaluser Member Posts: 214 ✭✭
    Genoil said:

    @Logicaluser yes I know of a way. Sounds like a nice afternoon project.

    http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/comment/17961/#Comment_17961

    AWESOME, thank you!

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • daisy17daisy17 Member Posts: 19 ✭
    Is there any parameters for ASUS R9 270x
    I have 3 x R9 270x but my average under 30MH/s
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • ericeric Member Posts: 76 ✭
    has anyone experienced dropped hashrate? before my 2 r9-280x runs @45-50 MHs. but yesterdayi noticed it dropped to 30Mhz.
    windows 10 64bit , 15.12 driver
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • daisy17daisy17 Member Posts: 19 ✭
    Its my first day of RIG :) So i havent any idea. But forums which i search, my hashrate must be 60MH/s. I think result of dropped hashrate.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • DPS50DPS50 Member Posts: 79 ✭
    What's the hashrate that you guys get today from a Radeon 7990 ?
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • bonafrissbonafriss Member Posts: 2 ✭
    Windows 7- gtx 780 - 20.23MH/s
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • FrederickFrederick Member Posts: 1 ✭
    Windows 8.1 PRO/ Gigabyte Radeon R9 390x 8GB
    min / mean / max: 25.6 / 26.2 / 28.0

    Inner mean: 27.2553 MH
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • happytreefriendshappytreefriends Member Posts: 537 ✭✭✭
    Windows 8.1 PRO / XFX Radeon R9-290 2GB (stock settings) : 23.5MH (O/C best 27MH)
    Windows 8.1 PRO / XFX Radeon R7-370 2GB (stock settings) : 16.2MH (O/C best 17MH)

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • zonozono Member Posts: 158 ✭✭
    any1 tried HD7850 (2GB)?
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • slundellslundell Member Posts: 31 ✭
    Getting around 13MH on my 7870 and 19MH on my 7970.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Sign In or Register to comment.