Categories
- 17.3K All Categories
- 9.5K Mining
- 574 Pool Discussion
- 378 Promotional
- 1.4K General Project Discussion (non-technical)
- 485 Education
- 811 Protocol and Client discussion
- 170 web3-js
- 29 Whisper
- 16 Swarm
- 3 RLP
- 303 IoT & Hardware
- 1.2K Smart Contracts and Dapps
- 28 Serpent
- 359 Solidity
- 664 Projects
- 1.2K Reference clients code and builds
- 249 Eth & AlethZero- Cpp Implementation
- 471 Geth - Go Implementation
- 242 Mist
- 15 Node.js Implementation
- 36 Python Implementation
- 49 Mix
- 36 Other Implementations
- 170 Meetups
- 40 Other Events
- 226 Jobs & Skills
- 281 Press and Articles
- 75 Audio/Video
- 296 Ether Sale
- 1.2K Other Languages
- 96 Chinese
- 255 German
- 33 Italian
- 111 French
- 3 Hebrew
- 42 Japanese
- 75 Portugese
- 46 Romanian
- 185 Russian
- 231 Spanish
- 47 Turkish
- 125 Watercooler
eth_newPendingTransactionFilter vs txpool
I was under the impression that eth_newPendingTransactionFilter returns pending transactions that are part of the `txpool`. However, in my recent experiment, this doesn't seem true.
Here is what I did. First I connected to a full node and start listening for a eth_newPendingTransactionFilter. Then I sent test transactions to the full node. Third, I made sure those transactions appear in the txpool by calling txpool.inspect. I expected they'd also show up in the filer, but they never did.
What could be the possible reasons?
Here is what I did. First I connected to a full node and start listening for a eth_newPendingTransactionFilter. Then I sent test transactions to the full node. Third, I made sure those transactions appear in the txpool by calling txpool.inspect. I expected they'd also show up in the filer, but they never did.
What could be the possible reasons?